Espace Jeunes FCOMTE

Main Menu

  • Home
  • French banks
  • French Economy
  • Young People Space
  • French University
  • University Fund

Espace Jeunes FCOMTE

Header Banner

Espace Jeunes FCOMTE

  • Home
  • French banks
  • French Economy
  • Young People Space
  • French University
  • University Fund
French banks
Home›French banks›3 Challenges in CFPB’s Investigation of “Unwanted Fees”

3 Challenges in CFPB’s Investigation of “Unwanted Fees”

By Lisa Perez
April 19, 2022
0
0

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) closed its public consultation on unwanted charges on April 11. Two days later, the agency published a blog post highlighting the billion-dollar savings consumers will soon see from the elimination of insufficient funds (NSF) fees on their checking accounts.

The CFPB engages in advocacy efforts to encourage banks to reduce NSF check and overdraft fees. However, the agency is “looking closely at whether and when charging these fees may be illegal”, suggesting further legal action is on the table.

The next steps in the investigation of “unwanted fees” are not yet clear, but rulemaking and enforcement action are distinct possibilities. However, the CFPB could face three challenges, given the nature of this survey and the data available.

  1. One size does not fit all

Since the announcement of this investigation, the CFPB has lumped together different types of fees, with different purposes and different industry players involved. These include regulated and unregulated fees. For example, credit card charges are subject to strict disclosure requirements and caps established in the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the CARD Act. Similarly, overdraft fees are subject to transparency obligations. This is different from other service fees like the “resort fee” mentioned by the CFPB which may not be regulated. So the agency could face an uphill battle if it tries to adopt the same measure for all these different fees.

  1. Competition

The CFPB recently published two blog posts, one in February and one in April, announcing that some banks have waived their NSF fees, or are considering doing so. The agency also released a report on March 29 with data on credit card late fees showing that these fees have declined over the past few years and were below the maximum cap. Additionally, the report also acknowledged that there are more and more companies offering credit cards with no late fees. While the CFPB praised itself for helping to reduce or eliminate NSF and overdraft fees, the data also suggests that these lower (or zero) fees may be the result of a competitive marketplace. New products are coming to market due to this competitive environment with low or no fees, including, for example, buy now, pay later (BNPL) or Bank On accounts. These are new deposit accounts with low or no fees, but with basic functions. Thus, the success claimed by the CFPB in reducing certain costs may be the result of healthy competition due to the innovation of FinTechs or traditional lenders. This would make market intervention more difficult to justify.

  1. The alternative scenario

The CFPB has many options if it decides to intervene. It can lower the cap on credit card fees, it can pass new rules requiring greater disclosure of fees, or it can open new investigations against specific companies, to name a few. The problem the agency may face is that by waiving a commission, they may also eliminate or limit access to the associated service, such as overdraft on a deposit account, which many clients find useful. Additionally, companies may be required to remove or reduce a fee, but they could create new fees or increase the prices of other services to offset the economic impact. So, by looking at a small part of a company’s business, the CFPB can consider remedies that might work in the short term but not necessarily in the long term.

Read more: CFPB report shows credit card late fees falling, below set limits

——————————

NEW PYMNTS DATA: THE FUTURE OF BUSINESS SUPPLIER INNOVATION STUDY – APRIL 2022

Plastiq - The Future Of Business Payables Innovation: How New B2B Payment Options Can Transform The SMB Back Office - April 2022 - Find out how all-in-one payment solutions can help businesses streamline B2B transactions and eliminate transaction friction. AP and AR management

On: While more than half of SMBs believe an all-in-one payment platform can save them time and improve cash flow visibility, 56% believe the solution could be difficult to integrate with AP systems and existing ARs. The Future Of Business Payables innovation report, a collaboration between PYMNTS and Plastiq, surveyed 500 SMBs with revenues between $500,000 and $100 million to explore how all-in-one solutions can exceed customer expectations. SMEs and help sustain their activities.

Related posts:

  1. Credit card interest rate notice
  2. How an exemption or short sale affects a credit score
  3. How to read (and interpret) your credit score
  4. The best loan offers for young students and workers

Recent Posts

  • National Academy of Sciences Elections, Modern Love Essay Contest Winner, Faculty Prize
  • Sweden and Finland may want to join NATO, but all is not well in the US-led alliance
  • Bank of England official warns of tough times for crypto
  • Prestwick Spaceport plans to inspire young people to reach for the stars via their ‘New Hope’ campaign – Reuters
  • PSG complete promotional tour in Qatar

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020

Categories

  • French banks
  • French Economy
  • French University
  • University Fund
  • Young People Space
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy